Democrats did not “make” Trump a criminal. Trump did that all by himself starting in the 1970s, if not earlier.

Donald Trump, always the liar and cheat, has repeatedly described civil verdicts against him regarding sexual abuse and business fraud as a “witch hunt” and “political persecution” initiated by Democratic opponents. Trump also hasn’t always been a Republican.

Donald Trump has switched his political party affiliation multiple times throughout his life. He was a registered Republican from 1987 to 1999, joined the Independence Party (1999–2001), became a Democrat (2001–2009), returned to the Republican Party (2009–2011), was unaffiliated (2011–2012), and rejoined the Republicans in 2012.

Regarding “witch hunts,” Trump’s history going back decades shows another story, which is not a lie.

In February 2024, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit—which included Judge Karen L. Henderson, appointed by George H.W. Bush—upheld a lower court ruling that denied Trump broad immunity from federal prosecution. The court ruled that as a former president, he was “citizen Trump” and could be prosecuted for acts committed while in office.

In December 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit—again with Republican appointees on the bench—upheld a decision that Trump could be held liable in civil lawsuits related to the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

Analysis of the 2025 judicial term, according to The New York times, showed that Trump’s appellate judge appointees voted overwhelmingly (92%) to allow his administration’s policies to take effect.

In August 2025, a New York appellate court, which included Republican-appointed judge David Friedman,  threw out a $500 million civil fraud penalty, calling it “excessive,” but upheld the findings of liability and guilt.

On May 30, 2024, a New York jury found Trump guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. This case was overseen by Judge Juan Merchan, who was appointed to the bench by a Republican Mayor, the verdict was reached by a jury of citizens after they heard the evidence.

While some legal proceedings have taken place in front of judges appointed by different parties, the convictions and liabilities were largely decided by juries or were civil findings of liability rather than criminal “guilty” verdicts by Republican-appointed judges themselves.

Donald Trump has been the subject of investigations, lawsuits, and allegations of improper or illegal activity throughout his career, spanning more than five decades. While specific criminal indictments did not occur until 2023, federal, state, and regulatory investigators have probed his business dealings in every decade since the 1970s.

  • 1970s: The Department of Justice accused Trump and his father of discriminating against Black renters in their apartment buildings (settled in 1975 without admission of guilt).
  • 1980s: Federal investigators probed whether Trump’s real estate projects were linked to organized crime figures, and New Jersey officials probed his ties to mob-connected individuals during the development of his Atlantic City casinos. He also paid a $750,000 fine in 1988 for violating antitrust laws regarding stock trades.
  • 1990s: Regulators in New Jersey investigated his financial stability, and he was involved in civil lawsuits regarding his casino bankruptcy, which included illegal advance payments on his inheritance.
  • 2000s: Federal securities regulators cited his casino company for misleading financial reporting.
  • 2010s: Trump University was sued for fraud, resulting in a $25 million settlement in 2018. Following his election, he was impeached twice, with allegations including solicitation of foreign interference in the 2016 election.
  • 2020s: Trump faced criminal investigations for election interference, mishandling classified documents, and fraud, resulting in his first indictment in March 2023.

Criminological studies have characterized his actions as a pattern of white-collar crime used to fuel business expansion and wealth over four decades.

Responses to “Democrats did not “make” Trump a criminal. Trump did that all by himself starting in the 1970s, if not earlier.”

  1. acflory Avatar

    I fine it mind boggling that any sane person could believe tRump is a ‘good’ business man. And I mean that in the sense of ‘someone who is good at business’. He has failed at just about everything he’s ever tried to do, and his only claim to fame is his ability to lie straight faced. -sigh-

    1. Lloyd Lofthouse Avatar

      He’s also a lifelong cheater. Cheats on his Wives. Cheats on his mistresses. Cheats contractors and workers. He even cheats at golf. And he gets away with that, too, most of the time.

      1. acflory Avatar

        One day someone’s going to write a biography of donnie and it’ll include the words ‘poor little rich boy’. I’m all out of sympathy.

      2. Lloyd Lofthouse Avatar

        Don the Con already had five biographies written about him before he came down that escalator. After that day, the author who wrote the only bio approved by Trump, was interviewed by the New Yorker Magazine, I think (could have been another magazine but I did read it), who said he put lipstick on a pig, and the title should have been The Sociopath instead of The Art of The Deal. That interview was covered by other news sources: https://www.newsweek.com/art-deal-coauthor-rename-book-sociopath-1420701

      3. acflory Avatar

        LMAO! I never believed the moron could string two coherent words together, but to have him outed like that is pure joy. I also love the fact that his ghost writer is adamant that he’s a true sociopath!
        Thank you so much for that link. I’ve bookmarked it so I can read it again when I need to cheer myself up. 😀

      4. Lloyd Lofthouse Avatar

        Trump’s ghost writer for the Art of the Deal isn’t the only one who said he is a sociopath or psychopath.

        Several individuals who worked in or closely with the Trump administration, along with family members and mental health professionals, have publicly described Donald Trump using terms such as narcissist, malignant narcissist, sociopath, or sadist.

        Based on public reports, books, and interviews, here are key individuals who have used these or similar terms:

        Mary Trump: Trump’s niece, a clinical psychologist, wrote the book Too Much and Never Enough, in which she describes her uncle as a narcissist and argues he exhibits sociopathic traits.

        Michael Cohen: Trump’s former personal attorney and fixer has frequently described Trump as a “narcissistic sociopath”.

        Miles Taylor: Former Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official who wrote Anonymous (“A Warning”), has referenced concerns about Trump’s mental stability and fitness for office.

        Anthony Scaramucci: Former White House Communications Director has suggested Trump shows signs of profound narcissism and, in later comments, has been critical of his stability.

        George Conway: Conservative attorney and husband of former White House counselor Kellyanne Conway. While not an employee, he was a key figure who founded the “Anti-Psychopath PAC” and frequently labeled Trump a “narcissistic sociopath”.

        Olivia Troye: Former aide to Vice President Mike Pence who served on the COVID-19 task force has expressed that Trump was “cruel” and lacked empathy, which aligns with descriptions of sadistic behavior mentioned by others.

        Dr. John Gartner: A psychologist who formerly taught at Johns Hopkins University and has been a prominent voice in the “Duty to Warn” movement, arguing that Trump is a “malignant narcissist”.

        Various Former Staff/Officials: Multiple former staffers, speaking on condition of anonymity to reporters like Michael Wolff or in books, have described behaviors consistent with the traits of a malignant narcissist, including grandiosity, a lack of empathy, and a “sadistic” enjoyment of others’ downfall.

        It is important to note that a 2024 campaign effort by a PAC included a letter signed by over 230 mental health professionals (clinical psychologists and psychiatrists) who argued that Trump’s behavior is consistent with malignant narcissism and that he is “grossly unfit for leadership”

        Based on reporting from October 2024, the retired four-star Marine general and former White House Chief of Staff who has heavily criticized Donald Trump is John Kelly. While Kelly did not explicitly use the words “sociopath” or “psychopath” in his on-the-record interviews with The New York Times and The Atlantic in October 2024, he described Trump as an authoritarian who “falls into the general definition of fascist” and “admires dictators”. Kelly noted that Trump had a “wannabe authoritarianism” and prioritized personal loyalty over the Constitution.

        General Mark Milley, the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was reported to have described Trump as “a total fascist” and “the most dangerous person ever”.

      5. acflory Avatar

        Great list, thanks Lloyd. I’ve been following Mary Trump for a while now and she’s excellent value. Some of the others I’ve heard of – i.e. Conway – from Trump v1, the others are new to me.
        I wonder if LAT [Life After Trump] could amend your constitution to make an independent physical and mental assessment mandatory for all presidential candidates? Then again, when everyone can be bought, I’m not sure how much actual value such an assessment would be. 😦

      6. Lloyd Lofthouse Avatar

        The U.S.Constitution was designed to be amended. The Founding Fathers who wrote it were the first ones to add amendments, the first ten, known as the Bill of Rights.”The first ten amendments to the United States Constitution are formally known as the Bill of Rights. Ratified on December 15, 1791, these amendments were added to explicitly protect individual liberties and limit the power of the federal government, largely in response to objections during the Constitution’s ratification. Another 17 were added since then. The last one was ratified in 1992.

        Still, the amendment process wasn’t designed to be easy. And as long as Trump, or someone like him is in power and his puppets control both Houses of Congress, it would be a mistake to push for another amendment because during the process anything might happen. We might end up losing the Bill of Rights that protects us from someone like monsters Trump and Putin. If the Constitution is amended again it may happen after Trump is gone, his regime is out of power, and the Democrats control Congress and the White House with a strong majority.

Leave a reply to acflory Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.