Does anyone ever question what political party in the United States does the best job dealing with poverty and why?

In this post, we are going to examine the top ten in each category—highest versus lowest rates of poverty. Each state gets three points. One point for each governor’s party and one point for the majority of the state senate and one point for the majority of the state house or general assembly. When I stared to research this topic, I had no idea what the results would be.

Top Ten States with the HIGHEST rates of poverty

#1 Mississippi 20.1% – GOP governor and State Legislature, and it is called a Right to Work state and only 5.3% of the work force belongs to a labor union—Right to Work means anti-union.

#2 Louisiana 18.3% – GOP governor and State Legislature, and it is called a Right to Work state and only 4.6% of the work force belongs to a labor union—Right to Work means anti-union.

#3 New Mexico 17.9% – GOP governor and State House (the State Senate majority is Democratic), and only 7.2% of the work force belongs to a labor union.

#4 Alabama 15.9% – GOP governor and State Legislature, and it is called a Right to Work state and only 9.8% of the work force belongs to a labor union—Right to Work means anti-union.

#5 Texas 16.2% – GOP governor and State Legislature, and it is called a Right to Work state and only 4.5% of the work force belongs to a labor union—Right to Work means anti-union.

#6 Arkansas 15.9% – GOP governor and State Legislature, and it is called a Right to Work state and only 5.9% of the work force belongs to a labor union—Right to Work means anti-union.

#7 Oklahoma 15.6% – GOP governor and State Legislature, and it is called a Right to Work state and only 6.6% of the work force belongs to a labor union—Right to Work means anti-union.

#8 West Virginia 15.4% – Democratic governor but GOP State Legislature and only 13.8% of the work force belongs to a labor union.

#9 Arizona 15.2% – GOP governor and State Legislature, and it is called a Right to Work state and only 8.8% of the work force belongs to a labor union—Right to Work means anti-union.

#10. South Carolina 15% – GOP governor and State Legislature, and it is a Right to Work state and only 3.9% of the work force belongs to a labor union—Right to Work means anti-union.

RESULTS: 93.3% of state governments for the TOP ten worst states for POVERTY in America are led by the Republican Party, and eight of these ten states are Right to Work states. A “right-to-work” law is a statute in the United States that prohibits union security agreements, or agreements between labor unions and employers, that govern the extent to which an established union can require employees’ membership, payment of union dues, or fees as a condition of employment, either before or after hiring.

Workers in Right to Work states earn about $5,300 a year less, have less health care with higher poverty rates and work related deaths are 51% higher because unions can’t speak up about worker safety.

Top Ten States with the LOWEST rates of poverty

#1 New Hampshire 5.6% – Democratic governor and GOP majority in both houses of the state Legislature, and only 10.6% of the work force belongs to a labor union.

#2 New Jersey 6.8% – GOP governor with a Democratic majority in the both houses of the state legislature, and only 18.3% of the work force belongs to a labor union.

#3 Vermont 7.6% – Democratic governor with a Democratic majority in both houses of the state legislature, and only 10.4 % of the work force belongs to a labor union.

#4 Minnesota 8.1% – Democratic governor with a Democratic majority in the State Senate and a GOP majority in the State House, and only 16.1% of the work force belongs to a labor union.

#5 Hawaii 8.6% – Democratic governor with a Democratic majority in both houses of the state legislature, and only 24.3% of the work force belongs to a labor union.

#6 Virginia 9.1% – Democratic governor and GOP majority in both houses of the state Legislature, and it is called a Right to Work state with only 4.1% of the work force belongs to a labor union—Right to Work means anti-union.

#7 Utah 9.2% – GOP governor and State Legislature, and it is called a Right to Work state with only 5.8% of the work force belongs to a labor union—Right to Work means anti-union.

#8 Delaware 9.2% – Democratic governor with a Democratic majority in both houses of the state legislature, and only 13.4% of the work force belongs to a labor union.

#9 Nebraska 9.5% – GOP governor and State Legislature, and it is called a Right to Work state with only 8.3% of the work force belongs to a labor union—Right to Work means anti-union.

#10 Connecticut 9.7% – Democratic governor with a Democratic majority in both houses of the state legislature, and only 16.9% of the work force belongs to a labor union.

RESULTS: 60% of the state governments for the TOP ten best states with the lowest POVERTY rates in America are led by the Democratic Party, and only three of these states are Right To Work states—this means that seven of the top ten states with the lowest poverty rates allow labor unions to negotiate for union workers.

How about the federal national debt? I’ll bet most Americans think that President Obama is responsible for that $18 Trillion debt and blame him. But if you look closely at the chart, you will quickly discover that of the last 12 presidents starting with Truman in 1945, three presidents are responsible for about half of that debt—they are Reagan and the two Bushes and these three presidents left Obama with a mess: two wars, the greatest financial recession since the Great Depression, the lowest tax rate in decades and the highest federal spending.

After reading this post, what is your conclusion about labor unions, Right-to-Work states/laws and the two major political parties when it comes to poverty and the federal national debt?

_______________________

Lloyd Lofthouse is a former U.S. Marine and Vietnam Veteran,
who taught in the public schools for thirty years (1975 – 2005).

His third book is Crazy is Normal, a classroom exposé, a memoir. “Lofthouse presents us with grungy classrooms, kids who don’t want to be in school, and the consequences of growing up in a hardscrabble world. While some parents support his efforts, many sabotage them—and isolated administrators make the work of Lofthouse and his peers even more difficult.” – Bruce Reeves

Honorable Mention in Biography/Autobiography at 2014 Southern California Book Festival

Lofthouse’s first novel was the award winning historical fiction My Splendid Concubine [3rd edition]. His second novel was the award winning thriller Running with the Enemy. His short story A Night at the “Well of Purity” was named a finalist of the 2007 Chicago Literary Awards. His wife is Anchee Min, the international, best-selling, award winning author of Red Azalea, a New York Times Notable Book of the Year (1992).

To follow this Blog via E-mail see upper left-hand column and click on “FOLLOW!”

Let’s take a close look at how many REAL deadbeats there are in the United States living off welfare

First, a few numbers to get started: there are more than 316 million Americans and 150.8 million are between the ages of 18 to 65—the primary working years for adults. In 2013, 47.1 million Americans lived below the poverty level; 73.6 million were under the age of 18, and 44.6 million were age 65 or older.

Wow, and in September 2014, there were 146.6 million Americans who were working at paid jobs.

But, a few, far-right billionaire oligarchs—for instance, the Walton family and the Koch brothers, and the fools who swallow their propaganda—think that more people in the United States are on welfare and are deadbeats than those who are working and supporting them.

I think it is arguable and safe to say that it would be a misleading lie that the majority of the Americans who are not working are deadbeats on welfare. Only a fool could think that. Is it possible that there are only 4.2 million Americans—who could be deadbeats—between 18 and 65 who do not have a paying job—that’s only 1.328% of the total population? I bet most of those 4.2 million are probably disabled and can’t work or are a stay at home parent.

Did you know ABC reported that Americans work more than anyone in the industrialized world—more than the English, the French, the Germans or Norwegians and even, recently, more than the Japanese?

In addition, according to the OECD, in the United States 67% [that is almost 70%] of people aged 15 to 64 [the working class years] have a paid job. … And having a good education is an important requisite for finding a job. In the United States, 89% of adults aged 25-64 have earned the equivalent of a high-school degree, higher than the OECD average of 75%—and yet some billionaires, including Bill Gates [worth almost $80 billion], the Koch brothers and the Walton family, would have you believe that the public education system in the United States is failing and must be reformed.

20 Something Finance even says “The U.S. is the Most Overworked Developed Nation in the World.” And Business Insider says the average person spends 90,000 hours at work over their lifetime—based on a 5 day 8 hour workweek with a two week vacation annually, that equals 45 years. I worked 45 years, starting at 15 and I retired at 60. My retirement check comes from CalSTRS, and I paid 8% of my gross income into CalSTRS for the 30 years I was a classroom teacher.

But a Houston based billionaire, according to the Democratic Underground, is attacking public pensions with a goal to kill the guaranteed-benefit plans that are run by teacher retirement systems in every state. This billionaire’s name is John Arnold, who is worth $2.9 billion dollars. Arnold runs a Houston-based hedge fund, and before that he worked for Enron, and it is said that he earned $750 million for Enron the year it went out of business. Huh, how do you earn $750 million for a company that goes out of business the same year?

Contrary to the popular thinking of fools, Social Security is not a form of welfare because workers and employers pay into that program for their entire working life, and in 2013, there were 38 million retired workers—nine out of ten individuals age 65 or older—who collected an average monthly benefit of $1,294. There were 4.9 million dependents; 8.8 million disabled workers, who were paid an average of $1,145 a month, and 6.2 million survivors—survivors are young children and a surviving spouse who cares for the children.

What about food stamps—a real welfare program?

From Media Matters.org we learn that nearly half (47% or 23 million), who get food stamps, were under the age of 18, and another 8 percent (3.9 million) were 60 or older; 41% (more than 20 million) lived in a household with earnings from a job. These workers are known as the “working poor”, and the average household on food stamps received a monthly benefit of $287.

And, these so-called deadbeats—that a few billionaires and a lot of fools think outnumber working Americans—are allegedly robbing us blind while they sit around drinking beer, eating popcorn and watching TV or having sex 18-hours a day to make more babies so they can collect more food stamps. If you believe that, then you might want to look in a mirror to see a fool.

If these billionaires succeed, what will replace progressive era plans like CalSTRS, Social Security, Medicare, unemployment and food stamps?

If we look back at history, we might discover the answer to that question. In 1900, before Presidents Theodore Roosevelt, Taft, Wilson, FDR, Kennedy and LBJ, ushered in the progressive era, 40-percent of Americans lived in poverty with only a 5% unemployment rate, and up until 1938, in some states, children could be sold as young as five to factories, coal mines and whorehouses. Imagine your five-year old child working as a prostitute, because boys and girls were sold into prostitution back then.

Is this the America a few billionaires, with help from some fools, are fighting to get back?

By the way, did you watch the video that comes with this post? It really is an educational eye opener.

_______________________

Lloyd Lofthouse is a former U.S. Marine and Vietnam Veteran,
who taught in the public schools for thirty years (1975 – 2005).

To follow this Blog via E-mail see upper left-hand column and click on “FOLLOW!”